Individual-based epidemiological model of COVID19 using location data

Because human movement spreads infection, and mobility is a good proxy for other social distancing measures, human mobility has been an important factor in the COVID19 epidemic. Therefore, the control of human mobility is one of the countermeasures used to suppress an epidemic.As a notable feature, COVID19 has had multiple waves (subepidemics). Understanding the causes of the start and end of each wave has important implications for a policy evaluation and the timely implementation of countermeasures. Some of the waves have been correlated with the changes in mobility, and some can be attributed to the emergence of new variants. However, the start and end of some of the waves are difficult to explain through known factors.To evaluate the effect of human mobility, we built a stochastic model incorporating individual movements of 500,000 people obtained from anonymized, user-approved location data of smartphones throughout Japan. Instead of using aggregate values of human mobility, our model tracks the movements of individuals and predicts the infection of all persons within the entire country. Although the model only has a single static parameter, it successfully reproduced the occurrence of three waves of the number of confirmed cases within the study period of March 01 to December 31, 2020 in Japan. It was previously difficult to explain the end of the second wave and the start of the third wave in the study period by human mobility alone. Our results suggest the importance of tracking individual movements instead of relaying the aggregate values of human mobility. © 2022 IEEE.

Detection of multiple waves for COVID-19 and its optimal control through media awareness and vaccination: study based on some Indian states.

COVID-19 is a highly infectious disease, and in very recent times, it has shown a massive impact throughout the globe. Several countries faced the COVID-19 infection waves multiple times. These later waves are more aggressive than the first wave and drastically impact social and economic factors. We developed a mechanistic model with imperfect lockdown effect, reinfection, transmission variability between symptomatic & asymptomatic, and media awareness to focus on the early detection of multiple waves and their control measures. Using daily COVID-19 cases data from six states of India, we estimated several important model parameters. Moreover, we estimated the home quarantine, community, and basic reproduction numbers. We developed an algorithm to carry out global sensitivity analysis (Sobol) of the parameters that influence the number of COVID-19 waves ( W C ) and the average number of COVID-19 cases in a wave ( A W ). We have identified some critical controlling parameters that mainly influenced W C and A W . Our study also revealed the best COVID-19 control strategy/strategies among vaccination, media awareness, and their combination using an optimal cost-effective study. The detailed analysis suggests that the severity of asymptomatic transmission is around 10% to 29% of that of symptomatic transmission in all six locations. About 1% to 4% of the total population under lockdown may contribute to new COVID-19 infection in all six locations. Optimal cost-effective analysis based on interventions, namely only vaccination (VA), only media awareness (ME), and a combination of vaccination & media (VA+ME), are projected for the period March 14, 2020, to August 31, 2021, for all the six locations. We have found that a large percentage of the population (26% to 45%) must be vaccinated from February 13 to August 31, 2021, to avert an optimal number of COVID-19 cases in these six locations. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11071-022-07887-5.

Controlling Multiple COVID-19 Epidemic Waves: An Insight from a Multi-scale Model Linking the Behaviour Change Dynamics to the Disease Transmission Dynamics.

COVID-19 epidemics exhibited multiple waves regionally and globally since 2020. It is important to understand the insight and underlying mechanisms of the multiple waves of COVID-19 epidemics in order to design more efficient non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) and vaccination strategies to prevent future waves. We propose a multi-scale model by linking the behaviour change dynamics to the disease transmission dynamics to investigate the effect of behaviour dynamics on COVID-19 epidemics using game theory. The proposed multi-scale models are calibrated and key parameters related to disease transmission dynamics and behavioural dynamics with/without vaccination are estimated based on COVID-19 epidemic data (daily reported cases and cumulative deaths) and vaccination data. Our modeling results demonstrate that the feedback loop between behaviour changes and COVID-19 transmission dynamics plays an essential role in inducing multiple epidemic waves. We find that the long period of high-prevalence or persistent deterioration of COVID-19 epidemics could drive almost all of the population to change their behaviours and maintain the altered behaviours. However, the effect of behaviour changes fades out gradually along the progress of epidemics. This suggests that it is essential to have not only persistent, but also effective behaviour changes in order to avoid subsequent epidemic waves. In addition, our model also suggests the importance to maintain the effective altered behaviours during the initial stage of vaccination, and to counteract relaxation of NPIs, it requires quick and massive vaccination to avoid future epidemic waves.

Multiple Epidemic Wave Model of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Modeling Study.

BACKGROUND: Intervention measures have been implemented around the world to mitigate the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Understanding the dynamics of the disease spread and the effectiveness of the interventions is essential in predicting its future evolution. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to simulate the effect of different social distancing interventions and investigate whether their timing and stringency can lead to multiple waves (subepidemics), which can provide a better fit to the wavy behavior observed in the infected population curve in the majority of countries. METHODS: We have designed and run agent-based simulations and a multiple wave model to fit the infected population data for many countries. We have also developed a novel Pandemic Response Index to provide a quantitative and objective way of ranking countries according to their COVID-19 response performance. RESULTS: We have analyzed data from 18 countries based on the multiple wave (subepidemics) hypothesis and present the relevant parameters. Multiple waves have been identified and were found to describe the data better. The effectiveness of intervention measures can be inferred by the peak intensities of the waves. Countries imposing fast and stringent interventions exhibit multiple waves with declining peak intensities. This result strongly corroborated with agent-based simulations outcomes. We also provided an estimate of how much lower the number of infections could have been if early and strict intervention measures had been taken to stop the spread at the first wave, as actually happened for a handful of countries. A novel index, the Pandemic Response Index, was constructed, and based on the model's results, an index value was assigned to each country, quantifying in an objective manner the country's response to the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic can be successfully modeled as a series of epidemic waves (subepidemics) and that it is possible to infer to what extent the imposition of early intervention measures can slow the spread of the disease.

Comparing COVID-19 and the 1918-19 influenza pandemics in the United Kingdom.

We compared the COVID-19 and 1918-19 influenza pandemics in the United Kingdom. We found that the ongoing COVID-19 wave of infection matched the major wave of the 1918-19 influenza pandemic surprisingly well, with both reaching similar magnitudes (in terms of estimated weekly new infections) and spending the same duration with over five cases per 1000 inhabitants over the previous two months. We also discussed the similarities in epidemiological characteristics between these two pandemics.